A refugee said "I cannot go back to my country because of the following points: 1. Imprisonment and Persecution 2. Torture and punishment 3. Electric torture 4. Beating with the stick on the feet (corporal punishment) 5. threatening me to be killed 6. Lack of human rights organizations which can lobby against human rights violation in the country. 7. Threatening to abuse my family members. 8. Demolition of my house. Due to all that I can’t go back".

Home Page

Apr 24, 2008

Ireland War and The Arms Trade Meeting 29/4/08





Galway Screening of short films 10 Days To War
Posted April 23rd, 2008 by webmaster
Start: 26/04/2008 - 20:15
Saturday, 26th April at 8.15pm in Richardsons, Eyre Sq., Galway
Screening of the BBC2 short films “10 Days To War”.
Ronan Bennett, the internationally acclaimed novelist, scripted the films. Ronan will speak at the GAAW event after the shorts have been shown.

Contact Galway Alliance Against War" gaaw1@eircom.net









Raytheon 9 Ireland War and The Arms Trade
Posted April 21st, 2008 by webmaster
Start: 29/04/2008 - 20:00
On Tuesday April 29th at 8pm the IAWM will host a meeting about Ireland and the arms trade.
Speakers:
Eamonn McCann (Author, Journalist, and One of the Raytheon 9)
Andy Story (Afri)
Susan Hensel (Co-ordinator, Clusters Munitions Coalition Ireland)
Venue: Wynns Hotel Lower Abby St Dublin











Haditha: charges dropped against 5 out of 8 US marines
Posted March 30th, 2008 by Dette_McLoughli...
SATURDAY, MARCH 29, 2008
Military prosecutors have dropped all charges against a US marine accused of killing unarmed Iraqi women and children in the town of Haditha in 2005.
Stephen Tatum, a lance corporal, is the fifth out of eight Haditha defendants to have charges dropped in a case that has brought international condemnation of US troops in Iraq. The dismissal on Friday comes just a day before Tatum was due to face a court martial on charges of involuntary manslaughter, reckless endangerment and aggravated assault over his role in the killings. However, in a statement released from the Marines Camp Pendleton base outside San Diego, the military said charges against Tatum had been dismissed "in order to continue to pursue the truth seeking process into the Haditha incident". In a statement, Jack Zimmerman, a defence lawyer, denied that Tatum had struck a deal with prosecutors that would see him testify against Frank Wuterich, a fellow marine, in exchange of immunity. Wuterich, a staff sergeant, is accused of being the ringleader and faces court-martial on nine counts of voluntary manslaughter later this year. "We emphasise that lance corporal Tatum will testify truthfully if called as a witness, but there is no deal for his testimony," Zimmerman said. "It became clear to the experienced prosecution team that the right thing to do was to dismiss all charges. "We believe the evidence shows that lance corporal Tatum reacted to an enemy attack the way he was trained to do"

Tatum was due to face trial for shooting dead two unarmed children when marines cleared houses near the scene of a deadly roadside bombing in Haditha, 260 kilometres west of Baghdad, on November 19, 2005. Four soldiers were initially charged with murder and four officers accused of covering up the incident. Immediately after the violence the marines said in a press statement that 15 Iraqis and a US marine had been killed as a result of the roadside bomb. An investigation by Time magazine later found that most of the casualties were killed when marines swept through three houses near the site of the bombing. The findings prompted a wide-ranging internal investigation.
However, since charges against the eight marines were first announced in December 2006, prosecutors have struggled to make the allegations stick. In Wuterich’s case, charges of murder were later replaced by the lesser offence of manslaughter. The military investigator overseeing Tatum's pre-trial hearing had recommended that charges against Tatum be dismissed on the grounds that he shot at the children because Wuterich had started firing. "I believe Tatum's real life experience and training on how to clear a room took over, and his body instinctively began firing while his head tried to grasp at what and why he was firing," Paul Ware, a lieutenant colonel, said. "By the time he could recognise that he was shooting at children, his body had already acted." Meanwhile Mark Zaid, a lawyer for Wuterich, said the dismissal showed that "there are tremendous holes" in the case. "The prosecution couldn't afford to have Tatum acquitted. So by dismissing the charges and turning him as a witness they will attempt to blame it all on staff sergeant Wuterich," Zaid told reporters on Friday. "They reached an early, rush-to-judgement conclusion that Wuterich was this rampaging murderer. But the truth is that the facts don't support that." The killings in Haditha are the most serious allegations of war crimes leveled at US forces since the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. The case is one of several involving marines from Camp Pendleton.
















Pension Fund Should Remove Money From Bomb Firms
Posted March 25th, 2008 by webmaster
The most telling thing in Dermot Ahern's statement in the article is the phrase "While not seeking to interfere with the statutory independence of the National Pensions Reserve Fund (NPRF) Commission...". What this means is that anything that appears in this article has absolutely no statutory effect. It is merely fudge. The Govt, if it is serious on the matter in the run-up to the May 'Cluster Bombs' Conference, will have to pass legislation to outlaw this kind of investment, which will apply to the NPRF Commission and to everyone else. While they're passing such legislation, they can also pass the major piece of necessary legislation, banning Irish involvement in everything to do with cluster munitions.
Government Ministers, like the rest of us, have to observe the law. The present law states that the NPRF is completely independent of Govt. Until another law banning investment in clusters is passed, nothing that Cowen or Dermot Ahern say, and least of all the headline, is worth a fiddler's. What counts is unilateral legislation.


Banning cluster bombs
Irish Times, Mon, Mar 17, 2008
Madam, - Minister Dermot Ahern is to be commended for his commitment to a complete ban on the production, stockpiling and use of Cluster munitions ( The Irish Times, March 6th). It is also good that the Irish Government is among the core group of countries which is leading international efforts in this regard and that it is hosting an international diplomatic conference to finalise an international convention to outlaw cluster munitions, in Dublin in May of this year.
Afri, which is one of the many NGOs active on this issue, has a number of concerns, one of which is raised in the Minister's Irish Timesarticle. We believe that it is appalling and totally unacceptable that, while working for a ban on the use of these most brutal and indiscriminate weapons, State pension funds should be invested in companies involved in the manufacture and sale of the self same weapons.
The purpose of pension funds, surely, is to provide peace and security for people in their old age. How ironic, then, that these funds should be invested in an industry that is built on death and destruction, mostly of civilians, often of old people, children and the most vulnerable in society.
Not only should Irish pension funds be withdrawn from companies manufacturing cluster bombs but from any company which is involved in the arms industry. Afri will be running a campaign to highlight this issue in the coming months.
The second concern we have is that the convention would be watered down, in the negotiations in Dublin, to such a degree that it becomes ineffective. We would urge the Minister and the Irish delegation to hold firm in this regard and to refuse to bow to countries which have a vested interest in continuing to use these obscene weapons, regardless of the horrific suffering caused to their innocent victims.
- Yours, etc,
JOE MURRAY, (Director, Afri), Phibsborough, Dublin 7.

Pension fund to remove money from bomb firms
DEAGLÁN DE BRÉADÚN, Political Correspondent
Irish Times 19 March 2008

THE NATIONAL Pensions Reserve Fund (NPRF), set up by the Government to finance the State's future pension requirements, is preparing to withdraw €27 million in investments from six international companies which are listed as being involved in the production of cluster munitions.
The new policy is likely to be adopted in the lead-up to a major international diplomatic conference on cluster munitions scheduled for Croke Park on May 19th-30th. The Government has taken a strong stance in favour of a total ban on cluster munitions.
A spokesman for the fund said it was likely to use the list of companies excluded from the Norwegian government's pension fund as a guideline. Eight companies were excluded by the Norwegians and the Irish fund had invested in six of these.
It was now proposed to withdraw these investments. The spokesman said five of the companies were US-based: Raytheon, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Alliant Techsystems and L3 Communications. The sixth was a French company, Thales.
The National Pension Reserve Fund spokesman pointed out that the sum involved, €27 million at the end of last year, was only a small percentage of the total amount of €21 billion invested annually by the fund.
In a recent letter to Minister for Finance Brian Cowen, which has been seen by The Irish Times, fund chairman Paul Carty said the legal advice available "does not give us much comfort" but that it was unlikely there would be objections from any group "in the Oireachtas or elsewhere" if the fund withdrew investments from these companies.
"In fact, in our view, the maintenance of such investments could give rise to growing public outrage and be contrary to Government policy. It would not be appropriate for the NPRF to continue to invest in this specific category.
"While it could be alleged that from a legal point of view we might not be in conformity with the NPRF Act, and that this Act should be changed before we do anything, the matter appears now to us to be urgent and uncontroversial."
In addition, the National Pension Reserve Fund Commission, responsible for controlling and managing the fund, was required to "exercise due care, skill, prudence and diligence" in the discharge of its functions. But Mr Carty asked for an assurance from Mr Cowen "that such legislation as may be considered necessary would be enacted in due course" to ensure the NPRF Commission was acting fully in conformity with the law.
The move is being undertaken following strong pressure from Minister for Foreign Affairs Dermot Ahern, who has been actively involved in the cluster munitions issue and has made repeated calls for an international ban on this type of military equipment.
Observers say this is the first time ethical investment has figured in Irish foreign policy. Mr Ahern, who is currently visiting Argentina, commented by telephone yesterday: "I saw at first hand on my visit to Lebanon last year the havoc that cluster bombs can cause. These small bomblets can look like decorations or toys and, as a result, children are very vulnerable to them.
"There is absolutely no justification for their use and Ireland will continue to campaign vigorously to have them completely banned. I am delighted that the NPRF managers are moving to end any investment of our pension money in companies that are linked to cluster munitions manufacture.
"This is a very significant move by Ireland and sends a clear message to the world in advance of the vital Croke Park conference," Mr Ahern said. He continued: "While not seeking to interfere with the statutory independence of the National Pensions Reserve Fund Commission, my objective was to try and ensure that no public funds are invested in any company involved in or associated with the production of cluster munitions. While there are a number of legal and practical issues still to be teased out, I can say that the reaction has been very positive and supportive."
The fund was established in 2001 by then minister for finance Charlie McCreevy to help with the financing of the State's future pension requirements






No comments: